Posts Tagged ‘fundraising’

Meredith McGehee: Lobbyists Shouldn’t Let Lax Fundraising Rules Complicate Their Work

Tuesday, December 4th, 2012 by Geoffrey Lyons

Meredith McGehee is the Policy Director of the Campaign Legal Center and principal of McGehee Strategies.  She has been named five times by The Hill as one of the top nonprofit/grassroots lobbyists in Washington.  McGehee can be reached at mmcgehee@campaignlegalcenter.org

IT'S A TRUISM that Members of Congress greatly depend on lobbyists for campaign fundraising.  This is because lobbyists can do more than just give direct contributions: they can solicit the support of the entire company, industry, or organization they represent.

Until recently, this was a relatively coherent process.  Lobbyists would help channel money to the right PACs, give advice to executives on individual contributions, and aid in managing bundling efforts.  All of this was done under the fundraising restrictions imposed by the FEC, such as the $2,500 limit for individual candidates.

But things are different now, and $2,500 looks like chump change.

After the Citizens United

and SpeechNow.org court decisions, meaningful limits are gone.  Members of Congress are still turning to lobbyists for campaign funds, but now the “ask” is for $10 million instead of $10,000.  The pressure to deliver this money will only grow as Democrats begin to fully embrace Super PACs, which they originally shunned.

Also burdening lobbyists is the rise of “dark money” groups that aren't required to disclose their donors.  Members of Congress see these as excellent avenues to get funding from a company or industry that they’d rather not associate with publicly.

Lobbyists at the center of the Washington money game will therefore be spending more time than ever figuring out how to respond to Member’s demands for money.  So too will they be occupied trying to decipher who is behind the funds pouring in against their clients.

For the lobbyists who believe more in their powers of persuasion than their ability to solicit contributions, now is the time to speak up and support the American Bar Association's proposal to detach lobbying from fundraising.

zp8497586rq

Election and PAC Roles in Advocacy Efforts

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011 by Brittany

Election Activities

What is it?

In some cases, it may be appropriate to engage members of the advocacy network in election-related activities.  Note, however, the restrictions on election-related activity discussed in Chapter 2.  Nonprofits organized under certain IRS “501” designations, in particular, may not engage in partisan election activity, such as endorsing a particular candidate for office.  Individual states and localities may also have restrictions of which advocate leaders should be aware.

Why is it useful?

Engaging advocates in election-related activities serves a number of purposes, including:

  • Raising the profile of an organization’s issue, both during the campaign and long after
  • Offering a new and often invigorating way for advocates to get involved in the policymaking process
  • Enhancing an organization’s access and reach in the legislature 

When should it be used?

Members of the U.S. House of Representatives are up for election every two years and U.S. Senators must stand for election every six.  In addition, most states and localities have elections for various state and local offices at least every other year.  Some localities have elections every year for both candidates as well as to address ballot questions, such as sales tax or funding initiatives.  Any election offers an opportunity to engage advocates, to the extent allowed by law.  Advocate leaders should consider, though, which level of government the organization hopes to build relationships with and choose the election cycle for participation carefully.

PAC / Fundraising Efforts

What is it?

As noted in Chapter 1, advocacy efforts should be coordinated in tandem with other government relations activities, include political action committees (PACs).  In fact, organizations will generally find a great deal of overlap between the most active and committed members of their advocacy network and the most consistent donors to their political action committees.  This section provides a few details on PACs and how they can be successfully integrated into an overall advocacy network plan.

Organizations form Generic Cialis PACs to finance political education and to make contributions toward the election or defeat of candidates.  They can contribute up to $5,000 per cycle per election to a candidate’s committee and $15,000 to national political parties.  They may receive up to $5,000 from individuals. 

Most organizations will establish a connected PAC that can solicit contributions only from members.  More information can be found on the FEC site at www.fec.gov.  Key materials on this site include:

Political action committees can also be formed at the state level.  Rules for establishing state PACs vary from state to state.  Organizations should look to their state’s Board of Elections for more information.

Why is it useful?

Overall, political action committees allow organizations to support the election of candidates who support their issues.  Some advocate leaders suggest that PAC contributions give advocates and government relations staff better access to policymakers, in that advocates will have the opportunity to attend fundraising events and be seen as supportive of the candidate.  

Political action committees can also enhance an organization’s advocacy activities and vice versa.  By coordinating existing programs or forming a new PAC to complement an advocacy network, organizations can reduce duplication, reach out in a more focused, targeted manner to politically active network members and possibly reduce overhead and cost.

When should it be used?

Any organization that already has a PAC should look for opportunities to, at a minimum, coordinate and possibly merge activities.  Organizations with advocacy networks but no PAC should determine whether a PAC would assist in meeting legislative and policy goals.

For more information or to purchase the Advocacy Handbook click here.